Become a part of the community. Register and take part in all the features the site has to offer.

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Brackenfell, Cape Town
    Posts
    37

    Default Sport Photography: 24-70 f2.8 vs 70-200 f2.8 VR1

    Hi

    I currently have a 70-200 f2.8 VR1 and a 300mm f2.8 that I use on my Nikon D750

    I'm considering buying a 24-70mm, I'm considering selling he VR1 70-200 f2.8 as my 300 cover the 70-200

    Do you think it will be the correct decision?

    kind regards

  2. #2
    Administrator SimonDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Centurion RSA
    Age
    58
    Posts
    22,870

    Default Re: Sport Photography: 24-70 f2.8 vs 70-200 f2.8 VR1

    Very difficult to say - what types of sport do you cover? Do you have accreditation which will allow you to get closer? If you feel the 300 will handle your type and style of shooting, then why not. I like the versatility of a zoom when shooting sports, makes framing easier on subjects that doesn't keep to a constant distance to camera. Personally I use Canon, but my sport lenses are 24-105 f4 L - for rallies, certain arena type sports such as athletics and gymnastics, Sigma 120-300 f2.8 for track racing, rugby etc, and a Sigma 300-800 for cricket and track racing.
    Simon Du Plessis

    www.actionimage.co.za simondp@actionimage.co.za

    (I'll keep on shooting, and one of these days I'll get it right!)
    Contact me for training in Beginners, Macro, Wildlife or Sport & Action photography
    Please e-mail or PM me should you wish to have my comments on a specific image, or to comment/ask questions on my crits)

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Brackenfell, Cape Town
    Posts
    37

    Default Re: Sport Photography: 24-70 f2.8 vs 70-200 f2.8 VR1

    Hi Simon

    I'm mostly doing school sports and Yes I do have Media Accreditation. I'm the guy who runs the facebook page "Brakkies Sport Fotos"
    Netball, hockey, athletics, rugby, cycling. MTBiking, everything school sport
    regards

  4. #4
    Administrator SimonDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Centurion RSA
    Age
    58
    Posts
    22,870

    Default Re: Sport Photography: 24-70 f2.8 vs 70-200 f2.8 VR1

    24-70 will do you good, especially for the MTB, athletics, and other close encounters. 300 good for rugby, athletics, cycling etc. I'd say go for it.
    Simon Du Plessis

    www.actionimage.co.za simondp@actionimage.co.za

    (I'll keep on shooting, and one of these days I'll get it right!)
    Contact me for training in Beginners, Macro, Wildlife or Sport & Action photography
    Please e-mail or PM me should you wish to have my comments on a specific image, or to comment/ask questions on my crits)

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Brackenfell, Cape Town
    Posts
    37

    Default Re: Sport Photography: 24-70 f2.8 vs 70-200 f2.8 VR1

    Thank you Simon. Much appreciated. kind regards
    To me, photography is the art of observation, it has little to do with the things you see and everything to do with the way you see them.

    https://www.facebook.com/BrakkiesSportFotos/

  6. #6
    Frequent Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    590

    Default Re: Sport Photography: 24-70 f2.8 vs 70-200 f2.8 VR1

    24-70/105 is a useful addition, but not substitution, for a 70-200.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Brackenfell, Cape Town
    Posts
    37

    Default Re: Sport Photography: 24-70 f2.8 vs 70-200 f2.8 VR1

    Hi Norm, I just love the 300mm f2.8, its a incredible sharp lens and I always find myself just adjusting my position (to use it),instead of swopping it out on the D750.
    Yes, the 70-200 f2.8 is not bad at all, I just think that I have to choose, "far away or very close". Ad the 70-200 is the in between.
    Do you think R10 for the 70-200 f2.8 VR1 is a good price? or is it to much?. kind regards
    To me, photography is the art of observation, it has little to do with the things you see and everything to do with the way you see them.

    https://www.facebook.com/BrakkiesSportFotos/

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •